Pro Bono Report::National (from betterlegalprofession.org)
abbreviations: A = Austin, CM = Costa Mesa, D = Dallas, FW = Fort Worth,
H = Houston, I = Irvine, LA = Los Angeles, NB = Newport Beach, P = Portland, R = Riverside, S = Seattle, SA = San Antonio,
SD = San Diego, SF = San Francisco, SV = Silicon Valley
See results for National Washington, DC Manhattan Chicago Northern California Boston Southern California Texas Atlanta Pacific Northwest Miami Philadelphia
Firm
Market Associate participation rate
Partner participation rate
Minimum hours
Average associate hours
Shearman & Sterling NYC 100% 32% 25 100 Jenner & Block Chicago 100% 82% 50 215 Hunton & Williams DC 100% 100% 50 100 Foley & Lardner DC 100% 81% * 106 Skadden, Arps (LA) SoCal 100% 59% * * Skadden, Arps NYC 100% 59% * * Wilmerhale NYC 100% 91% * 114.7 Blank Rome Phil 100% 58% 60 42 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Phil 100% 89% 20 * Morgan, Lewis & Bockius DC 100% 89% 20 * SEYFARTH SHAW NYC 100% 76% * 72.5 Linklaters NYC 100% 53% * * Foley & Lardner Chicago 100% 81% * 106 Choate, Hall & Stewart Boston 100% 57% * 82 Hunton & Williams (D) Texas 100% 100% 50 100 Foley & Lardner Boston 100% 81% * 106 Skadden, Arps DC 100% 59% * * Skadden, Arps Chicago 100% 59% * * Wilmerhale DC 100% 91% * 114.7 Mayer Brown NYC 100% 50% 60 116 Wilmerhale Boston 100% 91% * 114.7 Verill Dana NW 100% 43% 50 * Karr Tuttle Campbell (S) NW 100% 100% * * Blank Rome NYC 100% 58% 60 42 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius (SF) NorCal 100% 89% 20 * Patterson NYC 100% 100% * * Morgan, Lewis & Bockius NYC 100% 89% 20 * Steptoe & Johnson DC 99% 77% * 111 Manatt, Phelps & Phillips (LA) SoCal 99% 84% * 118 Schnader Harrison Phil 98% 67% 25 148 Dewey & Leboeuf NYC 98% 67% 50 275 Crowell & Moring DC 97% 54% 50 96 Hughes Hubbard & Reed NYC 96% 91% * * Mayer Brown Chicago 96% 56% 60 83 Patton Boggs DC 95% 60% 100 159 Dla Piper Us DC 94% 90% 60 103.28 Dla Piper Us Chicago 94% 90% 60 103.28 Dla Piper Us NYC 94% 90% 60 103.28 Dla Piper Us (SD) SoCal 94% 90% 60 103.28 Dla Piper Us Boston 94% 90% 60 103.28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher (LA) SoCal 93% 77% * 194 Dorsey & Whitney (S) NW 93% 86% * 110.34 Weil, Gotshal & Manges NYC 92% 91% 50 70 Nixon Peabody Boston 92% 77% 60 72 Winston & Strawn NYC 91% 47% 35 68 Tonkon Torp (P) NW 91% 72% 50 33 Mayer Brown DC 91% 60% * 91 Alston & Bird NYC 91% 92% 50 61 Winston & Strawn DC 91% 47% 35 68 Winston & Strawn Chicago 91% 47% 35 68 Alston & Bird Atlanta 91% 92% 50 61 Covington & Burling DC 90% 82% * 224 Covington & Burling NYC 90% 82% * 224 Stroock & Stroock & Lavan NYC 90% 58% * 78.3 Kirkland & Ellis DC 89% 77% 20 116 Arent Fox DC 89% 6% * 60.98 Hanson, Bridgett (SF) NorCal 88% 55% * 82 Debevoise & Plimpton NYC 88% 68% * 125.4 Fulbright & Jaworski (D) Texas 86% 72% * * Reed Smith Phil 86% 70% * * Ballard Spahr Phil 86% 63% 50 89 Fulbright & Jaworski (H) Texas 86% 72% * * Fulbright & Jaworski NYC 86% 72% * * Arnold & Porter DC 86% 83% * 136.1 Arnold & Porter LLP NYC 86% 83% * 136.1 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (SV) NorCal 85% 80% 25 99 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (SF) NorCal 85% 80% 25 99 Finnegan, Henderson DC 85% 47% * 71.7 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe NYC 85% 80% 25 99 Jackson Walker (D) Texas 85% 49% * 30 Katten Muchin Rosenman Chicago 83% 47% 40 58.5 Mcdermott Will & Emery Boston 83% 68% * * Mcdermott Will & Emery Chicago 83% 68% 60 * Katten Muchin Rosenman NYC 83% 47% 40 58.5 Mcdermott Will & Emery NYC 83% 68% 60 * Mcdermott Will & Emery DC 83% 68% 60 * Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt (P) NW 82% 73% * 27 Schulte Roth & Zabel NYC 81% 36% 30 76.2 White & Case NYC 81% 26% * 116 Wiley Rein DC 81% 59% 50 53 Lane Powell PC NW 81% 64% 100 80 Baker Botts DC 81% 15% 60 69.3 Baker Botts (D) Texas 81% 15% 60 69.3 Baker Botts (H) Texas 81% 15% 60 69.3 Bryan Cave NYC 80% 85% 50 92 Lane Powell (S) NW 80% 71% 100 81 Reed Smith Chicago 80% 47% * * Reed Smith NYC 80% 43% * * Dechert Phil 80% 75% 25 92.18 Dechert NYC 80% 75% 25 92.18 Locke Lord (D) Texas 79% 34% * 43 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher NYC 79% 60% * 132 Locke Lord (H) Texas 79% 34% * 43 Locke Lord Chicago 79% 34% * 43 Akin Gump (D) Texas 78% 50% 60 103.06 Akin Gump NYC 78% 50% 60 103.06 Akin Gump DC 78% 50% 60 103.06 Goodwin Procter DC 78% 60% 50 74 Goodwin Procter Boston 78% 60% 25 74 Hogan & Hartson DC 78% 79% 20 107 Goodwin Procter NYC 78% 60% 25 74 Mintz, Levin Boston 78% 61% * 88.07 Willkie Farr & Gallagher NYC 77% 52% * 77 Proskauer Rose Boston 76% 60% 50 61.8 Proskauer Rose NYC 76% 60% 50 61.8 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher DC 76% 74% * 97 Hogan & Hartson NYC 76% 65% 20 70 Farella Braun + Martel (SF) NorCal 75% 57% * 82 Vinson & Elkins (H) Texas 74% 31% * 35.91 Vinson & Elkins (D) Texas 74% 31% * 35.91 Cleary Gottlieb NYC 73% 46% * 97 Reed Smith NorCal 73% 37% * * Mckenna Long & Aldridge DC 72% 45% 50 42.9 Cleary Gottlieb DC 72% 63% * 89 Mckenna Long & Aldridge Atlanta 72% 45% 50 42.9 Duane Morris Phil 72% 39% * 39.77 Seyfarth Shaw Chicago 72% 31% * 45.4 Seyfarth Shaw Atlanta 72% 31% * 45.4 Seyfarth Shaw (LA) SoCal 72% 31% * 45.4 Seyfarth Shaw Boston 72% 31% * 45.4 Foster Pepper (S) NW 72% 50% 30 22.6 White & Case DC 71% 33% * 64 Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg Chicago 71% 30% 50 69 Sheppard, Mullin (LA) SoCal 71% 59% 50 49 King & Spalding NYC 69% 24% * 54.8 King & Spalding DC 69% 24% * 54.8 King & Spalding Atlanta 69% 24% * 54.8 Carlton Fields Miami 69% 44% * 69 Perkins Coie Brown & Bain (P) NW 69% 32% 50 98.2 Perkins Coie Brown & Bain (S) NW 69% 32% 50 98.2 Schiff Hardin Chicago 68% 55% * 95 Holland & Knight Chicago 68% 40% 50 73.5 Holland & Knight DC 68% 40% 50 73.5 Holland & Knight Miami 68% 40% 50 73.5 Holland & Knight Boston 68% 40% 50 73.5 Thompson & Knight (D) Texas 68% 21% * * Dickstein Shapiro DC 67% 51% 50 55 Morrison & Foerster (SF) NorCal 67% 50% * * Morrison & Foerster NYC 67% 50% * * Kaye Scholer NYC 67% 23% * 127 Morrison & Foerster (SV) NorCal 67% 50% * * Sidley Austin DC 67% 35% 60 79.15 Sidley Austin Chicago 67% 35% 60 79.15 Sidley Austin (LA) SoCal 67% 35% 60 79.15 Sidley Austin NYC 67% 35% 60 79.15 Ropes & Gray NYC 65% 52% * * Ropes & Gray Boston 65% 52% * * Kramer Levin NYC 65% 40% * 94.7 Fox Rothschild Phil 64% 41% * 20.5 Gardere Wynne Sewell (D) Texas 64% 29% * 30 Haynes And Boone (D) Texas 64% 49% * * Haynes And Boone (H) Texas 64% 49% * * Kirkland & Ellis Chicago 63% 40% 20 84 Kirkland & Ellis NYC 63% 40% 20 84 Jones Day (D) Texas 61% 38% * * Jones Day Atlanta 61% 38% * * Jones Day NYC 61% 38% * * Jones Day Chicago 61% 38% * * Jones Day DC 61% 38% * * Paul, Weiss NYC 60% 48% * 136.5 Wilson Sonsini (SV) NorCal 59% 25% 50 76.3 Drinker Biddle & Reath Chicago 59% 43% * 50.74 Drinker Biddle & Reath Phil 59% 43% * 50.74 Mcguirewoods Chicago 57% 33% * 24.8 Bell, Boyd & Lloyd Chicago 57% 39% 50 38 K&L Gates (S) NW 57% 39% 50 38 K&L Gates Boston 57% 39% 50 38 K&L Gates DC 57% 39% 50 38 K&L Gates (D) Texas 57% 39% 50 38 Chadbourne & Parke NYC 56% 40% 20 75.3 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft NYC 51% 18% * 38 Pillsbury Winthrop DC 50% 41% 20 128 Pillsbury Winthrop (SF) NorCal 50% 41% 20 128 Pillsbury Winthrop NYC 50% 41% 20 128 Seward & Kissel NYC 48% 36% * 31 Bilzin Sumberg Miami 46% 9% 20 17.9 Curtis, Mallet-prevost NYC 45% 23% * 13 Stoel Rives (P) NW 44% 28% * 30 Stoel Rives (S) NW 44% 28% * 30 Cravath, Swaine & Moore NYC 42% 57% * 90 Fish & Richardson Boston 39% 23% 50 60.52 Baker & Hostetler NYC 38% 37% * * Loeb & Loeb (LA) SoCal 36% 15% * 10.78 Loeb & Loeb NYC 36% 15% * 10.78 BRYAN CAVE Atlanta 36% 18% 50 23 McAndrews, Held & Malloy Chicago 35% 30% * * Fried, Frank DC * * 50 * Akerman Senterfitt Miami * * 50 * Bingham Mccutchen (SF) NorCal * * * * Sutherland Asbill DC * * 50 * Clifford Chance Us NYC * * 50 * White & Case Miami * * * 26 Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks Boston * * * * Greenberg Traurig Chicago * * * * Sedgwick, Detert (SF) NorCal * * * * Porter Hedges (H) Texas * * * * O'Melveny & Myers NYC * * * * Wachtell, Lipton NYC * * * * Latham & Watkins (SF) NorCal * * 60 * Nutter, Mcclennen & Fish Boston * * * * Fitzpatrick, Cella NYC * * * * Kilpatrick Stockton Atlanta * * 50 * Latham & Watkins (LA) SoCal * * 60 * Cahill Gordon & Reindel NYC * * * * Nelson Mullins Atlanta * * 45 * Ungaretti & Harris Chicago * * * * Davis Wright Tremaine (P) NW * * 8 * Kelley Drye & Warren NYC * * * * Paul, Hastings DC * * 75 * Weinberg Wheeler Atlanta * * * * Epstein Becker & Green NYC * * * * Andrews Kurth (H) Texas * * * * Davis Polk & Wardwell NYC * * * * Paul, Hastings Atlanta * * 75 * Riddell Williams (S) NW * * * * Stearns Weaver Miami * * * * Klarquist Sparkman (P) NW * * * * Williams & Connolly DC * * * * Bingham Mccutchen DC * * * * Herrick, Feinstein NYC * * 20 * Dow Lohnes DC * * * * Fried, Frank NYC * * 50 * Parker, Hudson Atlanta * * * * Wildman, Harrold Chicago * * 40 * Bingham Mccutchen Boston * * * * Sutherland Asbill Atlanta * * 50 * Pryor Cashman NYC * * * * Cooley Godward Kronish (SV) NorCal * * 60 * Greenberg Traurig Miami * * * * Miller Nash (P) NW * * 120 * O'Melveny & Myers DC * * * * Greenberg Traurig NYC * * * * Latham & Watkins DC * * 60 * O'Melveny & Myers (LA) SoCal * * * * Latham & Watkins NYC * * 60 * Quinn Emanuel NYC * * * * Vedder Price Chicago * * * * Baker & Mckenzie Chicago * * 60 * Kelly Hart & Hallman (FW) Texas * * * * Rutan & Tucker (CM) SoCal * * * * Quinn Emanuel SoCal * * * * Buchanan Ingersoll Phil * * * * Troutman Sanders Atlanta * * 50 * Latham & Watkins Chicago * * 60 * Davis Wright Tremaine (S) NW * * * * Paul, Hastings NYC * * 75 * Bracewell & Giuliani (H) Texas * * 150 * Edwards Angell Boston * * 60 * Paul, Hastings (LA) SoCal * * 75 * Williams Kastner (S) NW * * * * Hinckley, Allen & Snyder Boston * * * * Simpson Thacher NYC * * * * Bingham Mccutchen NYC * * * *
An asterisk indicates that the firm did not provide this information. We treated missing data as if it were zero.
See
How We Did This for more information on our methodology.
Bold denotes the most prestigious law firms in the country, according to vault's 2011 regional rankings